Reflection on Project 3 Draft

jackmac34. "Buttercups Flowers Orange Petals." 3/2015 via pixabay. CC0 Public Domain.

In this blog post I will go over who reviewed my draft for project 3 and give hyperlinks to the two projects that I commented on. These helped give me ideas on my own project as well.

I commented on Isaak's and Elliot's project 3s.

1) Isaak reviewed my rough draft.

2) What do I think and feel about the feedback I recieved? Did anything confuse me about the feedback?

I think the feedback was good. No much commentary on what I need to fix. Also I think that he interpreted my project as being a Tedd talk when instead I was really just linking a video to a Ted talk in the beginning and then going into my own article. So some of his comments he made were about it being a Tedd talk rather than an article.

3) What aspects of Project 3 need the most work going forward (Audience, Purpose, Argumentation, or Genre?) How do I plan on addressing these areas?

I need to work on better connecting with my audience. I start to get more personal with the argument towards the middle but I need to start that connection earlier and not just state facts but give my opinion on the facts as well.

4) How am I feeling overall about the direction of my project after peer review and teacher conferences this week?

I feel a lot better about my article since now I need to know what I need to work on the most.