Poor Commentary:
1)
Some commentary doesn't involve a whole lot of information to back up their claim. This means that their information is not quite as reliable since the reader does not know what exactly the writer is referring to. SurvivalOfTheAdaptable brings up that the US has a home/family problem but never really mentions what that problem is. It makes his information seem less credible.
This writer is definitely expressing a bit of anxiety towards the government getting involved in the education system. They believe that the government has bigger issues in which to be concerned. No hopeful thinking is brought up in the future about anything the government can do to improve upon the polices they have in place other than the obvious option of doing nothing.
Bill goes on to congratulate SurvivalOfTheAdaptable for sticking to his ideals and not being afraid of saying how he felt on the topic. SurvivalOfTheAdaptable seems to have had poor person experience in the home/family department.
But in order to redirect the commentary in that way means that that idea is on SurvivalOfTheAdaptable's mind. Either he finds family values very important and feels that is what the government should be focusing on, or has something to do with a bad experience of his.
2)
This post experiences the same issues as the above one. Shabby Road doesn't even really comment on the article about the No Child Left Behind, but rather the image that is included in the article. This declines his credibility since his attention is not even brought to the initial topic of the article.
This person does not really seem to be in fear of anything or wishing for a different outcome of the Act. It seems that Shabby is much more entertained by the picture of the child holding the pencil rather than the actual information itself. It is the first thing the reader sees and the information of the page draws your eyes to the picture a bit. more out of curiosity than anything.
Once again this post makes it hard to see the personal views of the writer since they did not really put the effort into writing much down. It seems Shabby is missing the point of the article.
But his name does link to his social networking sites, so you are able to explore the kind of person he is and further distinguish his credibility.
Now, lets move on to some more in depth and credible sources.
Good Commentary:
3)
Esther makes good points about the cycle of the education system and what really makes the difference in the level of knowledge of the students. Teaching a person thing between teacher and student and the government trying to force motivation in students can be a hard thing to accomplish.
It also seems as if she is speaking from person experience. Passion about a topic can be a good thing if it is controlled in more of a knowledge seeking way as it seems she is. This Act is impacting her in a personal way and she is giving her opinion about it. She is looking out to the future in more of a wishful manner in our education system. She is opting for better wages for teachers. They are undervalued in her eyes.
This opinion could come from personal experience in the field herself. It seems she know more of the personal effects that this Act has had on teachers. This could mean that she was a teacher or she personally knew a teacher that was impacted by this Act in a negative way.
But she also turns back to the topic of the NCLB Act by accusing it of frustrating teachers by setting different levels for their students' education as well as the pressure it puts on the teachers to reach the goals. Their jobs are literally depending on their students' test scores.
4)
Wong, Alia. "One Step Closer to Life After No Child Left Behind." The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 16 July 2015. Web. 29 Aug. 2015. |
Bdphd references the article and expresses his own views on the topic in a more educational manner but bringing in the effects of the actions presented by the information in the article. Both commenters bring into light the real value the tests provide. Overly motivated teachers can lead to cheating, which makes the tests an unreliable source of information.
There is also the teaching to the tests where the students are not getting as broad of an education. Focusing in on reading and math can mean that other topic such as social studies, or music are not focused in on as much.
But bdphd seems to be more talking in fear of the future in relation to the bill. He claims that is this in between phase of the Act education is reverting back to how it once was and now it seems that states can "water down" the tests they are giving to their students to measure their proficiency.
He also mentions that "we" are making it seem like the pointless tests, as he called them, are the most important thing in the world. I didn't know if he was referring to society in general or actual teachers expressing that emphasis on the test to their students.
The will to win, the desire to succeed, the urge to reach your full potential... these are the keys that will unlock the door to personal excellence. Confucius
Reflection:
In Evan's blog, I learned that emotion is not always a good thing to include in a blog without having enough facts to back up the point of view. Also, I have always been the type of person not to stir up trouble or create arguments, but it made sense that sometimes it is necessary to respond to negative posts so the entire comment thread does not consist of negative statements. For future readers coming into the discussion, a lot of negativity can send across the wrong message in the blog, especially if you know that it has been over dramatized or if you feel the article was correct in what it was portraying.
In Mira's blog, I noticed how important an introduction is for the reader. I have been doing a better job of explain what the blog is going to be about instead of making it more of an "essay" introduction. The blog posts that are shorter and state more opinion oriented statements automatically decrease credibility. It seems it is more done to get attention rather than to actually contribute to the discussion in a meaningful manor. If the commenter first establishes a reference from the article, then expresses their views it seems a lot more understandable to the viewer and more likely to view as credible. It seems they have actually read the article and have actual opinions and views on the issue.